從先占原則論釣魚島的地位.rar
從先占原則論釣魚島的地位,8200多字 14頁包括開題報(bào)告,任務(wù)書,文獻(xiàn)綜述,論文正文摘 要釣魚島自古以來就是中國的固有領(lǐng)土,但日本從上世紀(jì)60 年代末開始, 不斷對(duì)釣魚島提出主權(quán)要求并強(qiáng)行占領(lǐng)該島。自此,中國政府和全球華人以各種形式不斷抗議。在國際法中,合法取得領(lǐng)土的方式有多種,其中一種就是“先占”,即以取得國的名義并...
該文檔為壓縮文件,包含的文件列表如下:
內(nèi)容介紹
原文檔由會(huì)員 20023286 發(fā)布
從先占原則論釣魚島的地位
8200多字 14頁
包括開題報(bào)告,任務(wù)書,文獻(xiàn)綜述,論文正文
摘 要
釣魚島自古以來就是中國的固有領(lǐng)土,但日本從上世紀(jì)60 年代末開始, 不斷對(duì)釣魚島提出主權(quán)要求并強(qiáng)行占領(lǐng)該島。自此,中國政府和全球華人以各種形式不斷抗議。在國際法中,合法取得領(lǐng)土的方式有多種,其中一種就是“先占”,即以取得國的名義并為該國而占有土地,且在該土地上建立行政管理,它需要滿足四個(gè)條件:先占的主題是國家;主觀方面有意思表示;客體是無主地;客觀方面是有效占有。本文旨在從國際公法里“先占”原則分析釣魚島的地位,說明釣魚島不是無主地、不屬于“先占”原則的客體,以及從中國和日本對(duì)釣魚島的實(shí)際利用情況分析兩國對(duì)釣魚島的有效占有,從而說明日本妄圖占有釣魚島的行為是毫無根據(jù)和行不通的,中國對(duì)釣魚島的擁有絕對(duì)主權(quán)。
關(guān)鍵詞:先占, 無主地,有效占有
Discuss the status of Diaoyu island from the first principle
Abstract
Diaoyu island has been the territory of China from time immemorial,but from the end of last 60th, Japan put in a claim for Diaoyu island continuously and occupied it by force. From then on , Chinese government and ethnic Chinese person arroud golobe empressed their protest in every varity of form. In the international law,there are many legal way of getting territory , of which is “occupation” ,it means that occupied nation occupy territory in her name, and set executive management in the territory.Occupation need four important document: first, main subject of occupation is country;second,the country must show its subjective mean;third.the object of occupation is impersonally;the last,the objective side is effectively occupy. The purpose of this essay is going to analysis the status of the Diaoyu Islands, which based on the 'occupation' of the international law, then illustrate that the Diaoyu Islands is neither the terra nullius, nor belongs to the objective of 'occupation'. Moreover, according to analyze the actual utilization of the effectively occupy in two countries that including China and Japan, we can find out that the action of Japan attempted to occupy the Diaoyu Islands is groundless and just won't work,China has the absolute sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands.
Key words: occupation; terra nullius; effectively occupy
目 錄
摘 要…………………………………………………………………………………………………… II
Abstract ………………………………………………………………………………………………III
前 言……………………………………………………………………………………………………1
一、先占原則的概述…………………………………………………………………………2
(一)先占的主體是國家…………………………………………………………………… 2
(二)先占對(duì)象是無主土地………………………………………………………………… 2
(三)先占需實(shí)行有效占領(lǐng)………………………………………………………………… 2
二、釣魚島適用“先占”原則的情況……………………………………………………3
(一)無主地的確認(rèn)………………………………………………………………………… 3
1.中國的發(fā)現(xiàn)………………………………………………………………………………… 3
2.日本的發(fā)現(xiàn)………………………………………………………………………………… 4
(二)有效占有……………………………………………………………………………… 6
1.中國的有效占有…………………………………………………………………………… 6
2.日本所謂的有效占有……………………………………………………………………… 7
(三)釣魚島爭(zhēng)端的現(xiàn)狀…………………………………………………………………… 8
結(jié) 論………………………………………………………………………………………9
參考文獻(xiàn)………………………………………………………………………………………………10
致 謝………………………………………………………………………………………………… 11
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1]尹立杰.試論釣魚島領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端[D].北京:中國政法大學(xué),2002.
[2]崔熙東.中日兩國釣魚島紛爭(zhēng)的國際法分析[D].大連:大連海事大學(xué),2007.
[3]宋玉祥.中日釣魚島爭(zhēng)端之解決的國際法問題研究[D],廈門:廈門大學(xué),2006.
[4]李先波,鄧婷婷.從國際法看中日釣魚島爭(zhēng)端[J],長(zhǎng)沙:時(shí)代法學(xué), 2004,03: 6~12.
[5]陳振禎.釣魚島問題研究[D],福建:福建師范大學(xué),2006.
[8]管建強(qiáng).從國際法角度看釣魚島之爭(zhēng)[DB]
8200多字 14頁
包括開題報(bào)告,任務(wù)書,文獻(xiàn)綜述,論文正文
摘 要
釣魚島自古以來就是中國的固有領(lǐng)土,但日本從上世紀(jì)60 年代末開始, 不斷對(duì)釣魚島提出主權(quán)要求并強(qiáng)行占領(lǐng)該島。自此,中國政府和全球華人以各種形式不斷抗議。在國際法中,合法取得領(lǐng)土的方式有多種,其中一種就是“先占”,即以取得國的名義并為該國而占有土地,且在該土地上建立行政管理,它需要滿足四個(gè)條件:先占的主題是國家;主觀方面有意思表示;客體是無主地;客觀方面是有效占有。本文旨在從國際公法里“先占”原則分析釣魚島的地位,說明釣魚島不是無主地、不屬于“先占”原則的客體,以及從中國和日本對(duì)釣魚島的實(shí)際利用情況分析兩國對(duì)釣魚島的有效占有,從而說明日本妄圖占有釣魚島的行為是毫無根據(jù)和行不通的,中國對(duì)釣魚島的擁有絕對(duì)主權(quán)。
關(guān)鍵詞:先占, 無主地,有效占有
Discuss the status of Diaoyu island from the first principle
Abstract
Diaoyu island has been the territory of China from time immemorial,but from the end of last 60th, Japan put in a claim for Diaoyu island continuously and occupied it by force. From then on , Chinese government and ethnic Chinese person arroud golobe empressed their protest in every varity of form. In the international law,there are many legal way of getting territory , of which is “occupation” ,it means that occupied nation occupy territory in her name, and set executive management in the territory.Occupation need four important document: first, main subject of occupation is country;second,the country must show its subjective mean;third.the object of occupation is impersonally;the last,the objective side is effectively occupy. The purpose of this essay is going to analysis the status of the Diaoyu Islands, which based on the 'occupation' of the international law, then illustrate that the Diaoyu Islands is neither the terra nullius, nor belongs to the objective of 'occupation'. Moreover, according to analyze the actual utilization of the effectively occupy in two countries that including China and Japan, we can find out that the action of Japan attempted to occupy the Diaoyu Islands is groundless and just won't work,China has the absolute sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands.
Key words: occupation; terra nullius; effectively occupy
目 錄
摘 要…………………………………………………………………………………………………… II
Abstract ………………………………………………………………………………………………III
前 言……………………………………………………………………………………………………1
一、先占原則的概述…………………………………………………………………………2
(一)先占的主體是國家…………………………………………………………………… 2
(二)先占對(duì)象是無主土地………………………………………………………………… 2
(三)先占需實(shí)行有效占領(lǐng)………………………………………………………………… 2
二、釣魚島適用“先占”原則的情況……………………………………………………3
(一)無主地的確認(rèn)………………………………………………………………………… 3
1.中國的發(fā)現(xiàn)………………………………………………………………………………… 3
2.日本的發(fā)現(xiàn)………………………………………………………………………………… 4
(二)有效占有……………………………………………………………………………… 6
1.中國的有效占有…………………………………………………………………………… 6
2.日本所謂的有效占有……………………………………………………………………… 7
(三)釣魚島爭(zhēng)端的現(xiàn)狀…………………………………………………………………… 8
結(jié) 論………………………………………………………………………………………9
參考文獻(xiàn)………………………………………………………………………………………………10
致 謝………………………………………………………………………………………………… 11
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1]尹立杰.試論釣魚島領(lǐng)土爭(zhēng)端[D].北京:中國政法大學(xué),2002.
[2]崔熙東.中日兩國釣魚島紛爭(zhēng)的國際法分析[D].大連:大連海事大學(xué),2007.
[3]宋玉祥.中日釣魚島爭(zhēng)端之解決的國際法問題研究[D],廈門:廈門大學(xué),2006.
[4]李先波,鄧婷婷.從國際法看中日釣魚島爭(zhēng)端[J],長(zhǎng)沙:時(shí)代法學(xué), 2004,03: 6~12.
[5]陳振禎.釣魚島問題研究[D],福建:福建師范大學(xué),2006.
[8]管建強(qiáng).從國際法角度看釣魚島之爭(zhēng)[DB]