冷戰(zhàn)后美國外交的文化闡釋.doc
約19頁DOC格式手機打開展開
冷戰(zhàn)后美國外交的文化闡釋,us post-cold war foreign policy from a cultural perspectivecontentsabstract..........................................ikey words.....i摘要................
內(nèi)容介紹
此文檔由會員 xiaowei 發(fā)布
冷戰(zhàn)后美國外交的文化闡釋
US Post-Cold War Foreign Policy from a Cultural Perspective
Contents
Abstract……..……………………………………...……….....................................…I
Key Words……………………………………………………………………..……...I
摘要…………................…………………….…………......................................……Ⅱ
關(guān)鍵詞……………………………………………………………………..........……Ⅱ
Introduction…………………………………………………………………….……...1
I. A General Discription of the Three Kinds of Ideologies……………….…………...2
A. Liberalism..............................................……….…………...……….…………...2
B. Realism…………………………………………………………..………………3
C. Conservatism……………………………………………………..……………3
II. Manifestation and Embodiment of the Three Kinds of Ideologies……...………….4
A. Manifestation and Embodiment of Liberalism in American Foreign Policy.........4
B. Manifestation and Embodiment of Realism in American Foreign Policy…….....5
C. Manifestation and Embodiment of Conservatism in American Foreign Policy....6
III. Cultural Interpretation of US Foreign Policy after Cold War………………..........7
A. The Emphasis on Human Rights…….…….…..…………………………..……8
B. The Permeation of Culture in International Organizations...………..……......8
C. The Application of Humanitarianism to Pursue New Interventionism…………9
D. The Application of Market Economy for Cultural Permeation…………………9
E. The Recruitment of Human Talents Using Its Cultural Charming Offensive……………………………………………………..………………..10
Conclusion……………………………………………………………….……….…..12
Acknowledgements…….……………………………………….………………..…..13
Bibliography……………………………………………………………….…...….14
Abstract
As a national behavior, foreign policy is put into practice by a certain person and made by a specially appointed group of people. It demonstrates the distinctive essence of its national culture from the content to the implementation approach and means. US culture, as a huge soft radioactive and permeable national power, is always the basic driving force of its foreign policy as well as politics, national economy, and military force. Although its influence on US foreign policy is less obvious and direct than the other three key elements, it always curbs the most basic way and tendency of the US foreign policy like a ghost behind. The role it plays in the US foreign policy is more primitive and essential than the others. The cultural function and influence are demonstrated by its control of the US foreign policy; it makes the most basic way and tendency of US......
Bibliography
[1] Duanmu Yiwan. Reading Course in American & British News Publications. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2001.
[2] Henry Alfred Kissinger. DIPLOMACY. Haikou: Hainan Publishing House, 2005.
[3] John Mearsheimer. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2001.
[4] Josephine. Nye. The Paradox of American Power: Why The Worlds Only Superpower Can’t Go It Along. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
[5] R. Robertson. Globalization, Social Theory and Global Culture. London, Sage, 1992.
[6] Samuel. Huntington. The Clash of Civilizations. FOREIGN AFFAIRS, summer, 1993. Published by COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
http://www.foreignaffairs.org/19930601faessay5188/samuel-p-huntington/the-clash-of-civilizations.html.
字數(shù)：32341
US Post-Cold War Foreign Policy from a Cultural Perspective
Contents
Abstract……..……………………………………...……….....................................…I
Key Words……………………………………………………………………..……...I
摘要…………................…………………….…………......................................……Ⅱ
關(guān)鍵詞……………………………………………………………………..........……Ⅱ
Introduction…………………………………………………………………….……...1
I. A General Discription of the Three Kinds of Ideologies……………….…………...2
A. Liberalism..............................................……….…………...……….…………...2
B. Realism…………………………………………………………..………………3
C. Conservatism……………………………………………………..……………3
II. Manifestation and Embodiment of the Three Kinds of Ideologies……...………….4
A. Manifestation and Embodiment of Liberalism in American Foreign Policy.........4
B. Manifestation and Embodiment of Realism in American Foreign Policy…….....5
C. Manifestation and Embodiment of Conservatism in American Foreign Policy....6
III. Cultural Interpretation of US Foreign Policy after Cold War………………..........7
A. The Emphasis on Human Rights…….…….…..…………………………..……8
B. The Permeation of Culture in International Organizations...………..……......8
C. The Application of Humanitarianism to Pursue New Interventionism…………9
D. The Application of Market Economy for Cultural Permeation…………………9
E. The Recruitment of Human Talents Using Its Cultural Charming Offensive……………………………………………………..………………..10
Conclusion……………………………………………………………….……….…..12
Acknowledgements…….……………………………………….………………..…..13
Bibliography……………………………………………………………….…...….14
Abstract
As a national behavior, foreign policy is put into practice by a certain person and made by a specially appointed group of people. It demonstrates the distinctive essence of its national culture from the content to the implementation approach and means. US culture, as a huge soft radioactive and permeable national power, is always the basic driving force of its foreign policy as well as politics, national economy, and military force. Although its influence on US foreign policy is less obvious and direct than the other three key elements, it always curbs the most basic way and tendency of the US foreign policy like a ghost behind. The role it plays in the US foreign policy is more primitive and essential than the others. The cultural function and influence are demonstrated by its control of the US foreign policy; it makes the most basic way and tendency of US......
Bibliography
[1] Duanmu Yiwan. Reading Course in American & British News Publications. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2001.
[2] Henry Alfred Kissinger. DIPLOMACY. Haikou: Hainan Publishing House, 2005.
[3] John Mearsheimer. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2001.
[4] Josephine. Nye. The Paradox of American Power: Why The Worlds Only Superpower Can’t Go It Along. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
[5] R. Robertson. Globalization, Social Theory and Global Culture. London, Sage, 1992.
[6] Samuel. Huntington. The Clash of Civilizations. FOREIGN AFFAIRS, summer, 1993. Published by COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
http://www.foreignaffairs.org/19930601faessay5188/samuel-p-huntington/the-clash-of-civilizations.html.
字數(shù)：32341
