刑事訴訟中財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保障
2.1萬(wàn)字 28頁(yè)

包括開(kāi)題報(bào)告，任務(wù)書(shū)，封面，論文，文獻(xiàn)綜述，課題申報(bào)審批表，周進(jìn)展記錄表等完整畢業(yè)資料！



目 錄
摘 要 I
Abstract II
前言 1
第一章 人權(quán)、財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)與刑事訴訟 2
一、人權(quán) 2
（一）人權(quán)的概念 2
（二）財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)與人權(quán)的關(guān)系 2
二、刑事訴訟與財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán) 3
（一）刑事訴訟對(duì)財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保障性 3
（二）刑事訴訟對(duì)財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的威脅性 4
第二章 我國(guó)刑事訴訟法與財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)保障 6
一、偵查程序與財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)保障問(wèn)題 6
二、對(duì)涉案財(cái)物處理程序與財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)保障問(wèn)題 7
（一）公安機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)涉案財(cái)物的處理程序中存在的問(wèn)題 7
（二）檢察機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)涉案財(cái)物處理程序中存在的問(wèn)題 8
（三）審判機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)涉案財(cái)物處理程序中存在的問(wèn)題 9
第三章 國(guó)外相關(guān)立法與實(shí)踐 10
一、美國(guó) 10
（一）偵查措施的抑制 10
（二）裁判程序的保障 10
二、德國(guó) 11
（一）偵查措施的抑制 11
（二）裁判程序的保障 12
三、日本 12
（一）偵查措施的抑制 12
（二）裁判程序的保障 13
四、比較與分析 13
第四章 我國(guó)刑事訴訟財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)保障措施的構(gòu)建 15
一、偵查程序保障措施的構(gòu)建 15
二、涉案財(cái)物處理程序中保障措施的構(gòu)建 16
（一）撤銷(xiāo)案件中的保障措施 16
（二）不起訴中的保障措施 16
（三）審判過(guò)程中的保障措施 17
結(jié) 語(yǔ) 19
參考文獻(xiàn) 20



摘 要
財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)不僅是人權(quán)的重要組成部分，也是人權(quán)其他部分得以實(shí)現(xiàn)的重要保障。加強(qiáng)人權(quán)保障，這是刑事訴訟法的發(fā)展方向，而且，刑事訴訟法既有保障財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的一面，也有對(duì)財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)構(gòu)成威脅的一面，加強(qiáng)刑事訴訟法的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)保障功能，應(yīng)當(dāng)是刑事訴訟法的發(fā)展方向之一。我國(guó)刑事訴訟法向來(lái)側(cè)重于犯罪行為人刑事責(zé)任的追究，而對(duì)于財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保障缺乏關(guān)注，導(dǎo)致我國(guó)刑事訴訟的偵查程序與有關(guān)涉案財(cái)產(chǎn)處理程序上存在諸多問(wèn)題?，F(xiàn)在，隨著刑事訴訟人權(quán)保障功能的重視，犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的人身權(quán)利保障日益受到重視，但相關(guān)人員的合法財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保障仍然成為問(wèn)題。在國(guó)外，由于向來(lái)注重公民個(gè)人財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保障，不管是大陸法系國(guó)家還是英美法系國(guó)家的刑事訴訟，都比較重視對(duì)財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保障，對(duì)財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保障要求被視為刑事訴訟正當(dāng)程序的基本要求之一，在審前偵查程序、公訴程序以及審判程序都比較注重對(duì)相關(guān)財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保障。目前，財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)在我國(guó)越來(lái)越受到重視，刑事訴訟程序的設(shè)計(jì)也應(yīng)當(dāng)體現(xiàn)這一點(diǎn)。為此，我們應(yīng)當(dāng)根據(jù)我國(guó)的國(guó)情，借鑒國(guó)外的有益立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)與實(shí)踐，通過(guò)限制司法機(jī)關(guān)的部分權(quán)力，賦予涉案財(cái)產(chǎn)合法持有人應(yīng)有的權(quán)利、強(qiáng)化涉案財(cái)物處分程序的正當(dāng)化來(lái)完善刑事訴訟程序?qū)ω?cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保障。

關(guān)鍵詞：刑事訴訟 財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán) 涉案財(cái)物 保障



ON PROPERTY RIGHT PROTECTION
IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Abstract
Property right is not only an important part of human rights, but also is a very important guarantee to realize the other parts of human rights. Strengthening human rights protection is the development direction of the criminal procedure law. Moreover, the criminal procedure law not only protects property rights, but poses a threat to them. It should be one of the development directions of the criminal procedure law to strengthen the function of the guarantee on property right. The criminal responsibility investigation of the criminals is emphasized in criminal procedure law of our country, but the guarantee on property right is usually neglected, which result in some problems that investigation procedure and the processing program of the property involved in the case in criminal procedure law of our country. Nowadays, with the attention to the function of human rights protection in criminal procedure, the suspects and the personal rights of defendants are increasingly concerned, but there are still some problems in the protection of legal property rights of related people. In overseas, the protection of property right of individual citizens has always been emphasized, so they all pay attention to it whatever the criminal procedure of the civil law countries or the common law system countries. The requirement of the protection of property right is considered as one of the basic requirement of due process of criminal procedure. And just because of it, pretrial investigation procedure，the procedure of public litigation and the trial procedure all pay attention to the protection of the property right comparatively. In recent years, the property right has been emphasized more and more, so the design of criminal procedure should also present it. Therefore, according to the situation of our country, we should endow deserved right with the property of lawful holder involved in case by using the valuable legislative experience and practice of other countries for reference and limiting the part of right of judicial office. Meanwhile, we should improve the protection of property right of criminal procedure by strengthening the justification of measures procedure of property involved in case.
Key words: Criminal Procedure; Property rights; Property in involved cases; Guarantee





參考文獻(xiàn)
[6] 莎士比亞. 李爾王[M].上海：復(fù)旦大學(xué)出版社，2001.
[7] 托馬斯•魏根特. 岳禮玲、溫小潔譯.德國(guó)刑事訴訟程序[M].北京：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)出版社，2004.
[8] 陳新民.德國(guó)公法學(xué)基礎(chǔ)理論（下冊(cè)）[M].濟(jì)南：山東人民出版社，2001.
[9] 朱擁政.刑事訴訟中的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)保障[M].北京：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)出版社，2006.
[10] 方良平、江劍.財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)附加刑執(zhí)行主體應(yīng)明確[DB/OL].
[11] 李學(xué)軍主編.美國(guó)刑事訴訟規(guī)則[M].北京：中國(guó)檢察出版社 ，2003.
[12] [日]大塚仁著.馮軍譯.刑法概論（總論）[M].北京：中國(guó)人民大學(xué)出版社，2003.
[13] [日]松尾浩也著.張凌譯.日本刑事訴訟法[M].北京：中國(guó)人民大學(xué)出版社，2005.
[14] [日]田口守一著.劉迪等譯.刑事訴訟法[M].北京：法律出版社，2000.
[15] 彭瑾.論我國(guó)強(qiáng)制性偵查措施司法審查制度之建構(gòu)[M]. 成都：四川大學(xué)出版社，2005.
[16] 劉生榮等.刑事不起訴的理論與司法實(shí)務(wù)[M].北京：中國(guó)檢察出版社，1998.
[17] 陳瑞華.刑事偵查構(gòu)造之比較研究[J].政法論壇，1999，（5）.
[18] 馬登名、徐安住.財(cái)產(chǎn)刑研究[M].北京：中國(guó)檢察出版社，2004.
[19] 孫長(zhǎng)永.偵查程序與人權(quán)—比較法考察[M].北京：中國(guó)方正出版社，2000.
[20] 謝佑平、萬(wàn)毅.刑事偵查制度原理[M].北京：中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)出版社，2003.
[21] 陳光中.21世紀(jì)域外刑事訴訟立法最新發(fā)展[M].北京：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)出版社，2005.
[22] 陳永生.偵查程序原理[M].北京：中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)出版社，2003.
[23] 萬(wàn)毅.財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)與刑事訴訟——以被追訴人對(duì)產(chǎn)權(quán)保障為視角[M].成都：四川大學(xué)出版社，2005.
[24] John F.Ferdico. Criminal Procedure Wadsworth. 2001.
[25] H. C. Biack' s La' Dictiaiary, tithed. st. pain Ilicat. csi Publ fishing Co，1979.