新西蘭奧特來(lái)羅瓦的公正和法律----外文資料翻譯.doc
約12頁(yè)DOC格式手機(jī)打開展開
新西蘭奧特來(lái)羅瓦的公正和法律----外文資料翻譯,摘要：本文通過(guò)對(duì)兩個(gè)案例的學(xué)習(xí)，分析在新西蘭奧特來(lái)羅瓦法律的實(shí)踐和這個(gè)殖民大陸上“非法”、“不文明”以及“混亂”的關(guān)系。由于在奧特來(lái)羅瓦，法律和殖民利益的直接掛鉤，我認(rèn)為，無(wú)論在哈克黨案還是邁爾五世萬(wàn)佳市議會(huì)案，關(guān)于辯護(hù)的法令都著重于法律的權(quán)威性和對(duì)差異性的排擠之間的關(guān)系。據(jù)兩案的法官說(shuō)，毛利法律的規(guī)定和文化與“法律和...
內(nèi)容介紹
此文檔由會(huì)員 wanli1988go 發(fā)布
?aòa￡o±???í¨1y??á???°?àyμ??§?°￡?·????úD??÷à?°?ì?à′?Tí?·¨?éμ?êμ?ùoí?a???3??′ó??é??°·?·¨?±?￠?°2????÷?±ò??°?°?ì?ò?±μ?1??μ?￡óéóú?ú°?ì?à′?Tí?￡?·¨?éoí?3??à?ò?μ??±?ó1ò13￡??òè??a￡??T???ú1t??μ3°??1ê???????êàíò??êDòé?á°?￡?1?óú±??¤μ?·¨á???×???óú·¨?éμ?è¨ítD?oí??2?òìD?μ????·????μ?1??μ?￡?Yá?°?μ?·¨1ù?μ￡???à?·¨?éμ?1??¨oí???ˉó??°·¨?éoí?èDò?±?aò??-?ò??3?í??￡?ù?Y?3??áa?μ￡???à?·¨?éoí???ˉó????÷μ?ítD2?????ù±í??3?à′μ?1??μ￡?·¨?éoí?èDò?1??á?·¨?é??óúò???óD???ˉ??2?μ??°1?μ?2ù??￡?2￠?ò·′ó3á??á??1t￡¨?·?TD??÷à?μ?ê?×?￡?μ?à?ò??￡òò′?￡?ì???????3?????μ?ítD2ò?ê1·¨?é?úè?o?°?×óà????1??3????-óDμ?ítD2￡?±??????-±??í????×??üμ?±?á|￡?ò2òò′??a1??ú′ò?aá??ú?àμ?′ó???￡ò2Dí±èêμ?êé???ì??μμ?1￥?÷?üà÷o|μ?ê?￡??aD?·¨á?±???á?·¨?é??1??yD?μ?ì???￡?2???ê1·¨?éóD?é?@@é?aò???ì??¨???ˉ?×2?à?ò?μ?·′ó3￡????òòò′??ü±???±?μ??éò??a1??y·t???￡
ABSTRACT. Through two case studies, this essay examines the relationship between the operation and practice of law in Aotearoa New Zealand and the naming of the ??unlawful?ˉ, ??uncivil?ˉ or ??disorderly?ˉ within a colonial context. Against the background of the apparent complicity between law and colonial interest and desire in Aotearoa, I argue that, in both the ??Haka Party?ˉ case (1979) and Mair v Wanganui City Council (1996), the acts of the defendants draw attention to the relationship between the authority of the law and the repression or exclusion of difference. According to the judges in both cases, the dictates of Maori law and custom were in conflict with the principles of ??law and order?ˉ. Read in terms of colonial relations, the perceived relationship between Maori law and custom and the threat to ??civilisation?ˉ, law and order reveals the way in which ??the law?ˉ has operated in a culturally biased manner and has reflected the interests of Pakeha (New Zealanders of European descent). Thus, the perceived threat of the challenge made to the law in either case
ABSTRACT. Through two case studies, this essay examines the relationship between the operation and practice of law in Aotearoa New Zealand and the naming of the ??unlawful?ˉ, ??uncivil?ˉ or ??disorderly?ˉ within a colonial context. Against the background of the apparent complicity between law and colonial interest and desire in Aotearoa, I argue that, in both the ??Haka Party?ˉ case (1979) and Mair v Wanganui City Council (1996), the acts of the defendants draw attention to the relationship between the authority of the law and the repression or exclusion of difference. According to the judges in both cases, the dictates of Maori law and custom were in conflict with the principles of ??law and order?ˉ. Read in terms of colonial relations, the perceived relationship between Maori law and custom and the threat to ??civilisation?ˉ, law and order reveals the way in which ??the law?ˉ has operated in a culturally biased manner and has reflected the interests of Pakeha (New Zealanders of European descent). Thus, the perceived threat of the challenge made to the law in either case
