摘 要
當(dāng)前我國(guó)之所以還不能廢除死刑，就是因?yàn)槲覈?guó)現(xiàn)在還有死刑存在的社會(huì)土壤。人民群眾對(duì)正義的要求包含了殺人抵命、借債還錢的要求，不能說(shuō)這個(gè)規(guī)則永遠(yuǎn)是對(duì)的，但至少在現(xiàn)在來(lái)說(shuō)是對(duì)的，是民意所趨，是大勢(shì)所趨。我國(guó)現(xiàn)行死刑制度的存在并不是偶然的，是在充分借鑒中華民族優(yōu)秀傳統(tǒng)文化并且吸收國(guó)際先進(jìn)理念的基礎(chǔ)上形成的。從總體制度上講是基本合理的，但是還存在著一些問(wèn)題。因而在今后相當(dāng)長(zhǎng)的一段時(shí)間內(nèi)，在堅(jiān)持現(xiàn)有正確制度的基礎(chǔ)上，及時(shí)地根據(jù)時(shí)代的發(fā)展進(jìn)行調(diào)整，以求達(dá)到一個(gè)相對(duì)完善的程度，這才是一個(gè)科學(xué)的態(tài)度。

Abstract
This article in the limit death penalty aspect, emphatically from the legislation, the judicature, the procedure, the surveillance and aspects and so on system of announcing the death sentence with a two-year reprieve and forced labor carries on a series of limits, thus achieves cautiously with death penalty's goal, through this article elaboration, form a relatively comprehensive understanding in order to our country's death penalty system, then carries on some beneficial ponders to the present death penalty system. Because myself knowledge is limited, the deficiency, still invited the excuse me.
Keywords: Death penalty policy ，Death penalty system ，Subject matter ，
Countermeasure and consummation

目 錄
引 言
一、我國(guó)死刑制度的內(nèi)涵及功能
二、新中國(guó)死刑問(wèn)題的立法
三、我國(guó)死刑制度的問(wèn)題完善
（一）我國(guó)死刑立法存在的問(wèn)題
（二）對(duì)我國(guó)死刑制度的完善
四、我國(guó)死刑問(wèn)題的司法現(xiàn)狀
（一）摒棄重刑主義，慎重對(duì)待死刑
（二）完善死刑緩期執(zhí)行制度
（三）規(guī)范死刑司法解釋
（四）堅(jiān)持由最高法院行使死刑復(fù)核權(quán)
結(jié) 論
參考文獻(xiàn)
致 謝