演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析框架的構(gòu)建.rar
演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析框架的構(gòu)建,1.7萬字 26頁包括論文,開題報告,任務(wù)書,文獻(xiàn)綜述 摘要自從《國富論》出版后,經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)確立了獨(dú)立的理論系統(tǒng),成為一門獨(dú)立的學(xué)科,經(jīng)過多次的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)革命后,新古典經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)得以形成和發(fā)展并確立了其了現(xiàn)今的學(xué)科地位,這一學(xué)科以“理性經(jīng)濟(jì)人”為理論假設(shè)基礎(chǔ),學(xué)科內(nèi)部充斥著嚴(yán)重的數(shù)理化思想,導(dǎo)致現(xiàn)今經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)嚴(yán)...
該文檔為壓縮文件,包含的文件列表如下:
內(nèi)容介紹
原文檔由會員 abababab 發(fā)布
演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析框架的構(gòu)建
1.7萬字 26頁
包括論文,開題報告,任務(wù)書,文獻(xiàn)綜述
摘 要
自從《國富論》出版后,經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)確立了獨(dú)立的理論系統(tǒng),成為一門獨(dú)立的學(xué)科,經(jīng)過多次的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)革命后,新古典經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)得以形成和發(fā)展并確立了其了現(xiàn)今的學(xué)科地位,這一學(xué)科以“理性經(jīng)濟(jì)人”為理論假設(shè)基礎(chǔ),學(xué)科內(nèi)部充斥著嚴(yán)重的數(shù)理化思想,導(dǎo)致現(xiàn)今經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)嚴(yán)重的脫離了現(xiàn)實社會,所以目前的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)科遭受到不間斷的學(xué)科內(nèi)和學(xué)科之外的批判。由此,作為一門社會科學(xué),經(jīng)過部分經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家的突破,導(dǎo)致了多個經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分支的確立成型,在本文中筆者經(jīng)過對現(xiàn)今經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的批判,進(jìn)而就其中之一的演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分支進(jìn)行探討,試圖建立起演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的分析框架和對這一學(xué)科發(fā)展的指導(dǎo)意義進(jìn)行論述。
本文筆者從對經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)今發(fā)展趨勢的批判,進(jìn)而轉(zhuǎn)入對演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析框架支點(diǎn)的逐一構(gòu)建與深入分析,從經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)最為本質(zhì)的屬性—社會屬性開始,筆者進(jìn)而批判了現(xiàn)今經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的工具主義與力學(xué)主義,緊接著,筆者引入演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)這一經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分支,從經(jīng)濟(jì)的演化動力(生存與發(fā)展)開始入手,分析經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的動力來源,也就是為了生存而發(fā)展,發(fā)展為了生命體的存續(xù),同時本文中筆者分析了這演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)所存在的爭議,也就是達(dá)爾文主義與拉馬克主義的取舍。最終引入經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的幾個進(jìn)程結(jié)點(diǎn),包括試錯、創(chuàng)新、選擇,而后對這一分支科學(xué)的方向性與研究落腳點(diǎn)進(jìn)行總結(jié)與歸納。
關(guān)鍵詞:經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué),社會科學(xué),演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué),分析框架
Economics being a social sciences and the establishment of analytical framework of Evolutionary Economics
Abstract
Since the " The Wealth of Nations" was published, economics was able to establish an independent theoretical construct, and become an independent discipline. After a series of economic revolution, Neo-classical economics established the status of itselsf of the present. Have Homo Oeconomicus as the basis of theoretical assumptions,and full of serious mathematic and physical ideas inside Neo-classical economics that lead to a serious detached from real life. Therefore, the current Neo-classical economics exposed to continuous criticism both within and outside the discipline. Thus, as a social science, a breakthrough come after some economists’s hard work. All this happened result in the establishment of several branches of economics. In this article, the author try to discuss the Evolutionary Economics after the criticism of Neo-classical economics. further, the author trying to establish the analytical framework of Evolutionary Economics and discusse the significance of the analytical framework of Evolutionary Economics.
From Criticism of the present development of Economics, In this article,the Author trying to creat the fulcrum of Evolutionary Economics, and he is trying to do some In-depth analysis after The most essential attribute of Economics—Vergesellschaftung. Then,he tell us why Mathematical instrumentalism and Mechanics Doctrine demand criticism. in the coming part,he begin to talk about the Source of the devolopmet of Economics(exist and Development). Over the next few pages, he is going to analyse the controversy between Darwinism and Lamarckism.in the last part, he trying to summarize the result of the article.
Key words: economics, social sciences, Evolutionary Economics, analysis framework
目 錄
摘 要 I
Abstract II
二、對新古典經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的批判 1
(一)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)是一門社會科學(xué) 1
(二)對經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)基礎(chǔ)假設(shè)脫離現(xiàn)實的批判 3
(三)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)數(shù)學(xué)工具主義與經(jīng)濟(jì)力學(xué) 5
三、貼近現(xiàn)實的演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué) 6
(一)演化動力:生存(survive/ exist)、發(fā)展(develop) 6
(二) 拉馬克主義與達(dá)爾文主義 7
(三)試錯、創(chuàng)新、選擇 7
(四)演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)演化方向性、研究落腳點(diǎn)的探討 9
四、演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析框架的構(gòu)建 11
結(jié) 論 17
參考文獻(xiàn) 18
謝 辭 19
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1]宋勝洲.基于知識的演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué).上海世紀(jì)出版集團(tuán).2008.1-80
[2]庫爾特•多普菲,賈根良主譯.演化經(jīng)濟(jì)綱領(lǐng)與范圍.高等教育出版社.2004.
[3]約翰•福斯特,賈根良主譯.演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)前沿競爭、自組織與創(chuàng)新政策.2005.
[4]道格拉斯•諾思,鐘正生主譯.理解經(jīng)濟(jì)變遷過程.中國人民大學(xué)出版社.2008.1-100
[5]戴天宇.經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué):范式革命. 清華大學(xué)出版社 .2008.1-80
[6]譚偉東.超現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué),清華大學(xué)出版社.2007.1-83
[7]阿爾弗里德•馬歇爾,張桂玲, 黃道平編譯.經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)原理.國商業(yè)出版社 .2009.
[8]陳勁 主編. 演化與創(chuàng)新經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)評論. 科學(xué)出版社 .2009.20-30
[9]汪丁丁,葉航.理性的追問:關(guān)于經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)理性主義的對話.廣西師范大學(xué)出版社.2003.
[10]薛求知,黃佩燕,魯直.行為經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué):理論與擴(kuò)展.復(fù)旦大學(xué)出版社.2003.1-163
[11]靳濤.關(guān)于演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)思想的比較:凡勃倫、熊彼特、哈耶克,經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué),2002,(4)[12]黃凱南,演化博弈與演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué),經(jīng)濟(jì)研究,2009,(2).122-128
[13]楊虎濤.演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的過去、現(xiàn)在和將來,學(xué)術(shù)建設(shè),2006(4).71-80
[14]楊虎濤.演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)中的生物學(xué)隱喻_合理性_相似性與差異性,學(xué)術(shù)月刊2006(38).89-94
[15]章華.演化均衡與制度演化,浙江社會科學(xué),2004(3).85-90
[16]董志強(qiáng).制度及其演化的一般理論,管理世界,2008(5).151-165
[17]張軍,朱方明,陳健生.從“經(jīng)濟(jì)人”到“知識人”:解讀人性假設(shè)的歷史變遷與經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)研究范式的重構(gòu),經(jīng)濟(jì)評論,2004(4).36-42
[18]馬艷.基于馬克思經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)邏輯的相對理性經(jīng)濟(jì)人假設(shè),當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)研究,2007(10).23-28
[19]王宵前.對“理性經(jīng)濟(jì)人”假說的幾點(diǎn)質(zhì)疑,江蘇教育學(xué)院學(xué)報,2006,(6).71-73
[20] Veblen. “Why is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?”, Reprinted in The Place of Science in Modern Civilisation, New York: Russell &Russell,1898.56-81
[21] Witt, Ulrich.“Heuristic Twists and Ontological Creeds———A Road Map for Evolutionary Economics”, Papers on Economics and Evolution, Jena: Max Planck Institute of Economics,2007. #0701
[22]Witt, Ulrich. “Evolutionary Economics”, Papers on Economics and Evolution, Jena: Max Planck Institute of Economics,2006. #0605
1.7萬字 26頁
包括論文,開題報告,任務(wù)書,文獻(xiàn)綜述
摘 要
自從《國富論》出版后,經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)確立了獨(dú)立的理論系統(tǒng),成為一門獨(dú)立的學(xué)科,經(jīng)過多次的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)革命后,新古典經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)得以形成和發(fā)展并確立了其了現(xiàn)今的學(xué)科地位,這一學(xué)科以“理性經(jīng)濟(jì)人”為理論假設(shè)基礎(chǔ),學(xué)科內(nèi)部充斥著嚴(yán)重的數(shù)理化思想,導(dǎo)致現(xiàn)今經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)嚴(yán)重的脫離了現(xiàn)實社會,所以目前的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)科遭受到不間斷的學(xué)科內(nèi)和學(xué)科之外的批判。由此,作為一門社會科學(xué),經(jīng)過部分經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家的突破,導(dǎo)致了多個經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分支的確立成型,在本文中筆者經(jīng)過對現(xiàn)今經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的批判,進(jìn)而就其中之一的演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分支進(jìn)行探討,試圖建立起演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的分析框架和對這一學(xué)科發(fā)展的指導(dǎo)意義進(jìn)行論述。
本文筆者從對經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)今發(fā)展趨勢的批判,進(jìn)而轉(zhuǎn)入對演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析框架支點(diǎn)的逐一構(gòu)建與深入分析,從經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)最為本質(zhì)的屬性—社會屬性開始,筆者進(jìn)而批判了現(xiàn)今經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的工具主義與力學(xué)主義,緊接著,筆者引入演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)這一經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分支,從經(jīng)濟(jì)的演化動力(生存與發(fā)展)開始入手,分析經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的動力來源,也就是為了生存而發(fā)展,發(fā)展為了生命體的存續(xù),同時本文中筆者分析了這演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)所存在的爭議,也就是達(dá)爾文主義與拉馬克主義的取舍。最終引入經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的幾個進(jìn)程結(jié)點(diǎn),包括試錯、創(chuàng)新、選擇,而后對這一分支科學(xué)的方向性與研究落腳點(diǎn)進(jìn)行總結(jié)與歸納。
關(guān)鍵詞:經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué),社會科學(xué),演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué),分析框架
Economics being a social sciences and the establishment of analytical framework of Evolutionary Economics
Abstract
Since the " The Wealth of Nations" was published, economics was able to establish an independent theoretical construct, and become an independent discipline. After a series of economic revolution, Neo-classical economics established the status of itselsf of the present. Have Homo Oeconomicus as the basis of theoretical assumptions,and full of serious mathematic and physical ideas inside Neo-classical economics that lead to a serious detached from real life. Therefore, the current Neo-classical economics exposed to continuous criticism both within and outside the discipline. Thus, as a social science, a breakthrough come after some economists’s hard work. All this happened result in the establishment of several branches of economics. In this article, the author try to discuss the Evolutionary Economics after the criticism of Neo-classical economics. further, the author trying to establish the analytical framework of Evolutionary Economics and discusse the significance of the analytical framework of Evolutionary Economics.
From Criticism of the present development of Economics, In this article,the Author trying to creat the fulcrum of Evolutionary Economics, and he is trying to do some In-depth analysis after The most essential attribute of Economics—Vergesellschaftung. Then,he tell us why Mathematical instrumentalism and Mechanics Doctrine demand criticism. in the coming part,he begin to talk about the Source of the devolopmet of Economics(exist and Development). Over the next few pages, he is going to analyse the controversy between Darwinism and Lamarckism.in the last part, he trying to summarize the result of the article.
Key words: economics, social sciences, Evolutionary Economics, analysis framework
目 錄
摘 要 I
Abstract II
二、對新古典經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的批判 1
(一)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)是一門社會科學(xué) 1
(二)對經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)基礎(chǔ)假設(shè)脫離現(xiàn)實的批判 3
(三)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)數(shù)學(xué)工具主義與經(jīng)濟(jì)力學(xué) 5
三、貼近現(xiàn)實的演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué) 6
(一)演化動力:生存(survive/ exist)、發(fā)展(develop) 6
(二) 拉馬克主義與達(dá)爾文主義 7
(三)試錯、創(chuàng)新、選擇 7
(四)演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)演化方向性、研究落腳點(diǎn)的探討 9
四、演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析框架的構(gòu)建 11
結(jié) 論 17
參考文獻(xiàn) 18
謝 辭 19
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1]宋勝洲.基于知識的演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué).上海世紀(jì)出版集團(tuán).2008.1-80
[2]庫爾特•多普菲,賈根良主譯.演化經(jīng)濟(jì)綱領(lǐng)與范圍.高等教育出版社.2004.
[3]約翰•福斯特,賈根良主譯.演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)前沿競爭、自組織與創(chuàng)新政策.2005.
[4]道格拉斯•諾思,鐘正生主譯.理解經(jīng)濟(jì)變遷過程.中國人民大學(xué)出版社.2008.1-100
[5]戴天宇.經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué):范式革命. 清華大學(xué)出版社 .2008.1-80
[6]譚偉東.超現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué),清華大學(xué)出版社.2007.1-83
[7]阿爾弗里德•馬歇爾,張桂玲, 黃道平編譯.經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)原理.國商業(yè)出版社 .2009.
[8]陳勁 主編. 演化與創(chuàng)新經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)評論. 科學(xué)出版社 .2009.20-30
[9]汪丁丁,葉航.理性的追問:關(guān)于經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)理性主義的對話.廣西師范大學(xué)出版社.2003.
[10]薛求知,黃佩燕,魯直.行為經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué):理論與擴(kuò)展.復(fù)旦大學(xué)出版社.2003.1-163
[11]靳濤.關(guān)于演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)思想的比較:凡勃倫、熊彼特、哈耶克,經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué),2002,(4)[12]黃凱南,演化博弈與演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué),經(jīng)濟(jì)研究,2009,(2).122-128
[13]楊虎濤.演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的過去、現(xiàn)在和將來,學(xué)術(shù)建設(shè),2006(4).71-80
[14]楊虎濤.演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)中的生物學(xué)隱喻_合理性_相似性與差異性,學(xué)術(shù)月刊2006(38).89-94
[15]章華.演化均衡與制度演化,浙江社會科學(xué),2004(3).85-90
[16]董志強(qiáng).制度及其演化的一般理論,管理世界,2008(5).151-165
[17]張軍,朱方明,陳健生.從“經(jīng)濟(jì)人”到“知識人”:解讀人性假設(shè)的歷史變遷與經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)研究范式的重構(gòu),經(jīng)濟(jì)評論,2004(4).36-42
[18]馬艷.基于馬克思經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)邏輯的相對理性經(jīng)濟(jì)人假設(shè),當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)研究,2007(10).23-28
[19]王宵前.對“理性經(jīng)濟(jì)人”假說的幾點(diǎn)質(zhì)疑,江蘇教育學(xué)院學(xué)報,2006,(6).71-73
[20] Veblen. “Why is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?”, Reprinted in The Place of Science in Modern Civilisation, New York: Russell &Russell,1898.56-81
[21] Witt, Ulrich.“Heuristic Twists and Ontological Creeds———A Road Map for Evolutionary Economics”, Papers on Economics and Evolution, Jena: Max Planck Institute of Economics,2007. #0701
[22]Witt, Ulrich. “Evolutionary Economics”, Papers on Economics and Evolution, Jena: Max Planck Institute of Economics,2006. #0605