我國(guó)仲裁司法監(jiān)督制度的完善
1.1萬(wàn)字 15頁(yè)

包括開題報(bào)告，任務(wù)書，封面，論文，文獻(xiàn)綜述，課題申報(bào)審批表，周進(jìn)展記錄表，中期檢查表等整套畢業(yè)資料，推薦下載！


目 錄
摘要……………………………………………………………IV
ABSTRACT……………………………………………………… V
引言…………………………………………………………… 6
一、仲裁司法監(jiān)督的法理依據(jù)…………………………………7
（一）維護(hù)仲裁公正……………………………………………………7
（二）救濟(jì)當(dāng)事人合法權(quán)益……………………………………………7
（三）保障仲裁順利進(jìn)行………………………………………………8
二、我國(guó)現(xiàn)行仲裁司法監(jiān)督制度存在的問(wèn)題…………………… 9
（一）仲裁協(xié)議效力異議制度的規(guī)定不科學(xué)…………………………9
（二）不予執(zhí)行仲裁裁決與撤銷仲裁裁決制度設(shè)置不當(dāng)……………9
（三）雙軌制監(jiān)督模式有違司法統(tǒng)一原理……………………………10
（四）重新仲裁制度規(guī)定不具體………………………………………10
三、完善我國(guó)仲裁司法監(jiān)督制度的思考…………………………12
（一）正確定位法院與仲裁的關(guān)系……………………………………12
(二)協(xié)調(diào)相關(guān)法律規(guī)定………………………………………………12
（三）完善我國(guó)仲裁司法監(jiān)督制度的具體建議………………………13
１．規(guī)范對(duì)仲裁協(xié)議效力的異議制度………………………………………13
２．理順撤銷裁決與不予執(zhí)行裁決的關(guān)系…………………………………13
３．統(tǒng)一內(nèi)外有別的雙軌制………………………………………………14
４．細(xì)化重新仲裁制度……………………………………………………14
５．建立程序性監(jiān)督為主的司法監(jiān)督模式…………………………………15
結(jié)論…………………………………………………………………… 18
參考文獻(xiàn)………………………………………………………………19
致謝…………………………………………………………………… 20



摘要

司法監(jiān)督作為仲裁監(jiān)督機(jī)制的重心，在經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)下也發(fā)生或正在發(fā)生著顯著的變化，但是由于客觀歷史條件的限制，仲裁法中的某些規(guī)定并不能順應(yīng)司法與仲裁關(guān)系發(fā)展的國(guó)際潮流，有些規(guī)定還缺乏可操作性。針對(duì)當(dāng)前我國(guó)仲裁司法監(jiān)督機(jī)制中存在的問(wèn)題，其中如何平衡司法機(jī)制和仲裁機(jī)制在民商事糾紛處理機(jī)制上的關(guān)系，確定仲裁司法監(jiān)督的范圍，構(gòu)建程序性監(jiān)督機(jī)制是關(guān)鍵，有助于保障仲裁的獨(dú)立性和自治性，也有利于我國(guó)仲裁司法監(jiān)督體制的完善。本文結(jié)合仲裁的特點(diǎn)，針對(duì)當(dāng)前我國(guó)仲裁司法監(jiān)督制度中存在的問(wèn)題，以促進(jìn)仲裁發(fā)展為原則，以司法監(jiān)督提升仲裁質(zhì)量、促進(jìn)仲裁事業(yè)健康發(fā)展為宗旨，提出一些探索性意見，正確定位法院與仲裁的關(guān)系,協(xié)調(diào)相關(guān)法律規(guī)定,規(guī)范仲裁協(xié)議異議制度,理順撤銷裁決與不予執(zhí)行裁決的關(guān)系,統(tǒng)一內(nèi)外有別的雙軌制,細(xì)化重新仲裁制度,建立以程序性監(jiān)督為主的司法監(jiān)督模式，以期順應(yīng)國(guó)際潮流，有利于我國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)仲裁司法監(jiān)督制度的完善。

關(guān)鍵字：仲裁 司法監(jiān)督 程序性監(jiān)督 完善




Abstract

The judicial supervision is the center of gravity which arbitrates to inspect a mechanism, under the development trend that economic integral whole turn also take place or is take place variety of show the change, but arbitrate some provision within method because of objective history conditional restriction also can't adjust the international current that judicatory and arbitrament relate to a development, some provision still lack maneuverability.Aim at a current our country arbitrament judicatory direct the existent problem in the mechanism, how among them the equilibrium and judicial mechanism handle the relation of mechanism with arbitrate a mechanism matter dispute at the people company and make sure the scope of the arbitrament judicial supervise, set up the procedure supervise mechanism is a key and contribute to guarantee arbitral of independence and autonomy, also be advantageous to our country arbitrate judicatory supervise system of perfect.This text combines an arbitral characteristics, aim at a current our country arbitrament judicatory supervise the existent problem in the system, take promoting arbitrate to develop as a principle, with the judicial supervise promote arbitrament quality and promote arbitrament business to healthily develop into aim, put forward some quest an opinion, exactitude fixed position court and arbitrate of relation, moderate related law provision, norm arbitrate agreement objection system, manage fluently cancel decide with not to performance verdict of relation, unify inside outside is different from of double track system, thin turn to re-arbitrate system, build up with procedure supervise is lord of judicatory supervise mode, adjust international current by period, be advantageous to our country domestic arbitrate judicatory supervise system of perfect.

Key words:Arbitration; judicial supervise;procedurale supervision;perfect



參考文獻(xiàn)：
[1]趙健.國(guó)際商事仲裁的司法監(jiān)督[M].北京:法律出版社,2000.
[2]劉惠榮,肖鵬,李湛.論人民法院對(duì)仲裁的司法監(jiān)督[J].青島海洋大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào),2002,4.
[3]萬(wàn)鄂湘，于喜富.我國(guó)仲裁司法監(jiān)督制度的最新發(fā)展—評(píng)最高人民法院關(guān)于適用仲裁法的司法解釋[J].法學(xué)評(píng)論,2007,1(141).
[4]王冶英、任以順.國(guó)內(nèi)仲裁司法監(jiān)督機(jī)制存在的弊端與消除[J].中共濟(jì)南市委黨校學(xué)報(bào),2005,3.
[5]王小莉.從一起撤銷仲裁決案看我國(guó)司法監(jiān)督的范圍[J].仲裁研究,2007,02.
[6] 張祥云.完善我國(guó)商事仲裁司法監(jiān)督制度之思考[D].北京:中國(guó)政法大學(xué),2006.
[7] 張斌生.仲裁法新論[M].廈門:廈門大學(xué)出版社,2002.
[8] 胡君,賀金林.仲裁司法監(jiān)督的國(guó)際走向及其啟示[J].湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào),2004,5(1).
[9] 羅楚湘.仲裁的司法監(jiān)督:過(guò)度干預(yù)和控制還是適度監(jiān)督[J].武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版),2005,58(2).
[10]劉俊海.完善國(guó)內(nèi)仲裁司法監(jiān)督問(wèn)題的法學(xué)思考[J].北京仲裁,2004,1.
[11]史飚.商事仲裁的監(jiān)督與制約機(jī)制研究[D].中國(guó)政法大學(xué)研究生院,2003.
[12]劉惠榮,肖鵬,李湛.論人民法院對(duì)仲裁的司法監(jiān)督[J].青島海洋大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版),2002,04.
[13]楊曉迪.我國(guó)涉外仲裁司法審查制度的問(wèn)題與完善[J].經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊,2007,8.
[14]房保國(guó),徐昀.我國(guó)仲裁司法監(jiān)督中存在的問(wèn)題與對(duì)策[J].燕山大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào),2005,6(1).
[15]馬占軍.論我國(guó)仲裁裁決的撤銷與不予執(zhí)行制度的修改與完善—兼評(píng)《最高人民法院關(guān)于適用〈中華人民共和國(guó)仲裁法〉若干問(wèn)題的解釋》的相關(guān)規(guī)定[J].法學(xué)雜志,2007,1.
[16]洪浩.論新時(shí)期我國(guó)仲裁司法監(jiān)督范圍的調(diào)整—以一組數(shù)據(jù)為樣本的實(shí)證分析[J].法學(xué)評(píng)論,2007,1(141).
[17]王莉.國(guó)內(nèi)仲裁司法監(jiān)督實(shí)證研究—以北京仲裁委員會(huì)為例[J].北京仲裁,2003,6.
[18]徐前權(quán).論法院對(duì)仲裁監(jiān)督與支持的統(tǒng)一[J].求索,2005,3.
[19]齊瑞.淺談我國(guó)的仲裁司法監(jiān)督[J].內(nèi)蒙古電大學(xué)刊.2005,4(68).
[21]譚兵,黃勝春.中國(guó)仲裁制度的改革與完善[M].北京:人民出版社,2005.
[22]楊秀清.協(xié)議仲裁制度研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2006.
[23]International litigation and arbitration .practice and planning/Russell J.weintraub[M].4thed.Durham,N.C:Carolina Academic press,2003.